• Andy’s E-BOOK — Photography Travel Guides

  • PLEASE RESPECT COPYRIGHTS!!

    All Images and writing on this blog are copyrighted by Andy Richards. All rights are reserved. You may not, without my express, written permission, download, right click, or otherwise copy my images for any reason. Copying an image and putting it on your blog, website, or even as a screensaver on your computer is a breach of copyright, EVEN IF YOU ATTRIBUTE THE SOURCE! Please do not do so.
  • On This Blog:

  • Categories

  • Andy’s Photography Galleries

    Click Here To See My Gallery of Photographic Images

    LightCentric Photography

  • Andy's Flickr Photos

  • Prior Posts

  • Posts By Date

    July 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  

Nik Viveza Software

I have been slow to adopt third party software.  My thinking has always been (stubbornly in many cases) that I should be able to do it on my own in Photoshop.  And I still don’t doubt that is true.  I should be able to.  However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that I will be able to.  And perhaps more importantly, it doesn’t mean that I will be able to do so with the ease that some of these new programs afford us.  I have had a copy of one version or other of Photoshop on my computer since I started shooting digital images (before that, I experimented with the various “Photoshop Lite” products that often shipped with printers and cameras, or with a couple of the “competing” programs out there. I soon enough learned, though, that there really were no “competing” programs with Adobe Photoshop. In all probability, that is still true, although, Photoshop Elements gets increasingly more robust, and programs like Adobe Lightroom and Apple Aperture have become pretty good photo editing software in their own right. But each time I begin to use one of them, I eventually find myself looking for one of the functions I rely on in Photoshop.

There is still no competing software with Photoshop

In keeping with that (perhaps elitist) attitude, I have pretty steadfastly avoided any of the third party plugin software that has become ubiquitous in the digital photo world. My feeling has been that they really didn’t offer anything more than a GUI (graphical user interface) for functionality that was/is already resident in Photoshop. For the most part, I think that remains true. Plugins are truly that—plugins to be used with a “host” software.

But that has, in my view, all changed now, with the Nik software tools. Nik’s U-point technology has radically changed the way we can work with Photoshop. Before I get to that I want to acknowledge that I may have been wrong. There. That wasn’t so hard :-).  Seriously, here is where I have been missing the proverbial boat. Yes, most of the things done by the plugin software can be done in PS already. But it takes a significant amount of time, skill and patience; and the makers of much of the third party plugins have figured out how to do it much more quickly, easily, efficiently and accurately!

For a long time, I have been a follower and admirer of the late Bruce Fraser and his “heir apparent” (they were actually long-time, friends, colleagues and collaborators) Jeff Schewe. I read (really read) several versions of their books, Real World Image Sharpening and Real World Camera Raw, and used their recipes for PS Actions for sharpening. So it was only stubbornness that has kept me for all these years from obtaining a copy of Pixel Genius Photokit Sharpener (Fraser and Schewe were part of the original Pixel Genius company). Now I have learned that I can fit most of my sharpening needs by running the plugin, which takes a few seconds, and in most cases, doesn’t even require any tweaking.

Likewise, I remained “from Missouri,” when friends and mentors told me about the Nik software plugins. I finally downloaded Nik Viveza and purchased “Nik Software Captured,” (the only current book, to my knowledge, available on the Nik Suite of software) after “playing” with the free download for a couple hours.

Nik’s U-Point Technology has radically changed the way we can work with Photoshop

Nik’s suite of photo software is different from other plugins, in that it offers a unique new technology that while it could probably be duplicated in Photoshop by someone who is far, far more proficient in both Photoshop and software engineering than me, it is not a “resident” feature of Photoshop. This special technology, U-point, is at its most basic, a very sophisticated, yet easy to use, selection and masking tool. I have spent hours, often frustrating, making complex selections, masks and layer masks of skies, trees, waterfalls, and objects in Photoshop; often with less than optimal results. One U-point “control point” and a couple of slider moves more often than not replaces those hours of painstaking selection these days for me.

The suite includes a set of plugin filters for color work (Color Efex), one for black and white (Silver Efex), a noise reduction program (Dfine), a sharpening program, and Viveza. They can be bought separately, or as a suite. If you are going to buy 2 or more of them, the suite probably is a no-brainer. In my case, I have not yet been persuaded that the other offerings from Nik are worth my time and $ (did I say I am stubborn?), so I only have Viveza so far.

A pet peeve of mine is how software (and, for that matter, cameras, stereos, etc.), often ship today with skeletal documentation, often in pdf form. I understand the pdf part. Publishing is expensive and I am all for saving another tree. I also understand that creating decent documentation is a time-consuming and potentially expensive process. But its still a peeve. For $100 plus in software, it seems like it would be nice to have a “how to” book ship with the software, instead of having to spend another $25-100 (depending on the program and the book) on a third-party “text.” There is pdf information about the basics on the Nik website. They also have a nice “learning center” with a number of videos that do a good job demonstrating it on specific images. But I would like to see a basic explanation of the theory and use of the software. I went to Amazon and searched for books on Nik Viveza. There is apparently only one book currently available: “Nik Software Captured,” by Tony Corbell and Joshua Haftel (Josh is a Nik employee). But if you are planning on using (or are already using) Nik Software, I recommend buying it. There is another book in the works, “Plug In with Nik: A Photographer’s Guide to Creating Dynamic Images with Nik Software” by John Batdorff, scheduled to ship in November or December. I have it pre-ordered at Amazon and will try to do a review on receipt and reading.

The image at the beginning of the blog is a shot of a pretty little waterfall on the North end of the beach at the Miner’s Castle area of Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore near Munising in the Michigan Upper Peninsula. Here is the “before” image:

Eliot Falls, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore
Copyright 2009 Andy Richards

think the “after” image looks clearly better. In the “before” image  the water (and for that matter, the image as a whole) has a color cast.  While often difficult to see on a computer monitor (especially a non-calibrated monitor or a laptop monitor), blues definitely come out in a print—sometimes to the point of ruining what looked on-screen like it might make a pretty nice print. This often requires us to go back into Photoshop and (in my case at least) engage in trial and error. For my purposes, putting the image up on screen or on my website did not justify the painstaking work that would be involved to sharpen this image and get it color-ready for printing, until there was a reason to print it. So often, my workflow involved a “quick and dirty” provisioning of the photo to make it “web” ready. Getting those blues out of the water involves a multi-step process in Photoshop. In Viveza, it only involved setting a few “control points” in the right places and working with the sliders (thank you to my mentor, James Moore, for some help on how to quickly, accurately and effectively remove the blue cast and for the most part, the magenta cast—Jim is a pro, a teacher, and an expert in digital development and fine art printing and offers one-on-one web-based instruction—I highly recommend Jim).

Oxbow Bend; Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming
Copyright 2012 Andy Richards

In my image of Oxbow Bend, taken in May of 2012, the original capture shown here demonstrates a high contrast look (reminiscent of Fuji Velvia, for those of us old enough to remember what that is), in which there are deep shadows. My friend, mentor and very talented fine-art photographer and printer, Kerry Liebowitz, recently showed me a blending technique, from the raw image using Photoshop and Photomatix HDR software and his “version” is noticeably better.  But what struck me was that at the same time he was demonstrating this approach, I downloaded the Viveza  software and was able to get the kind of results shown below, with a very short learning curve and to make the adjustments very quickly.

Oxbow Bend; Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming
Copyright 2012 Andy Richards

The Viveza version of this image is what persuaded me to actually purchase the software (NIK lets you download fully functional trial versions of all of its software).  Blending technique are a time-consuming and possibly trial and error process. There are others, too, like Tony Kuyper’s Luminosity Blending actions. But this is so quick and effective, that it is hard not to see the value in it.

Being pretty excited about its possibilities, I next started going through some of my older images, to see what a difference I might see using the Viveza software.  This image of Tahquamenon Falls, made in the Michigan “U.P.”in 2004, is a prime example of a major improvement with only a few minutes’ work.

“BEFORE”” Tahquamenon Falls, Michigan U.P.
Copyright 2004 Andy Richards

As you can see from the comparison, the “before” image has retained the a color cast partly from the brown minerals in the water and partly from the complex reflections from the foliage and sky.  It is not really natural and the the crisp, inviting image I would like to see.

Some quick work with control points in Viveza, and some changes in saturation and contrast gives the “after” result.  I not only like it better, but think it is more like what my “mind’s-eye” remembers seeing from behind the lens.  Overall, I think is is a more pleasing image.

“AFTER”; Tahquamenon Falls, Michigan U.P.
Copyright 2004 Andy Richards

Viveza is so quick and effective, that it is hard not to see the value in it

Obviously, I have decided it is a “worthy” addition to my digital development workflow, and so I have now gone from saying “bah humbug” to heartily recommending that folks give Viveza a try. I know it will be a permanent part of my repertoire for the foreseeable future.

Advertisements

10 Responses

  1. Friend at work (progression D90-D700-D800) recently bought the suite. He uses Lightroom but not PS. Will be interesting how he likes the software. I have Dfine, but like most of my software, have not learned it well. I am still on Lightroom as well. I can spend a lot on a lens but find it hard to shell out that much on software (PS). Going to have to bite the bullet someday.

    • Yeah. PS is a large “bite.” While I am glad I did it years back and its behind me now, the upgrades seems to be coming faster, and Adobe now appears to have a policy of not letting you “skip” them.

      Like most of the other applications, the NIK software on LR is slightly less functional than it is on PS.

  2. I’m sorry, I thought I just read you say you were WRONG? Did I read that correctly???? Just kidding yah! 🙂
    As you know, I have been using Viveza for a few years now and have been very happy with it. This past Christmas, Mr. S bought me a bundled pack of Nik Software, including color efex pro, and like you, I have recently been going over some of my older images using this software and have been very pleased with the results.
    I really like what you have done with your example images here Andy. Good job!
    Carol

  3. Nice work with the image examples you’ve shown with this post, Andy. They are clearly better without the color casts now. And a nice write up of the efficiency, usefulness, and advantages of the PS plugins you’ve highlighted too. Have fun with those older images!

  4. A nice and well balanced view Andy with good sample images. You might like to know I have recently published a Viveza 2 book on Amazon. Someone needed to. Great blog also by the way.

    • Robin: Thanks for the comment. I downloaded your book and have just begun reading. I hope to spend some time with it over the holiday. As you have identified, there is a dearth of instructional information on these very powerful programs. Thanks for adding!

    • Robin: Thanks for your comments. Sorry it took a while to get back to you. I purchased the eBook and have now read through it. Robin’s book is very affordable, and is a good overview of what Viveza has to offer. The book also has some nice tips and insights on process within Viveza. I recommend it as a pre-read to the “Nik Software Captured” book.

  5. […] the error of my ways (and my own narrow-mindedness) in a couple of recent blog posts on Viveza and Color […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: